|
-------- Original Message --------
| From: |
Bob |
| To: |
****** |
| Subject: |
Walt's statements. (& Hal's) |
| Date: |
Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:07:08 -0500 |
|
Walt was wise in not disclosing in the following quotes the details of
the conversations, though he does effectively admit that he knows that
the calls were taped when he claims that they have "hard evidence"
regarding the content of the calls.
"In addition, it is criminally punishable [in Illinois] to disclose
information one knows or should know was obtained through an
eavesdropping device." I don't have a clue whether a judge would say
that saying that Linda's calls were not about Nathan constitutes such an
information disclosure. That might be getting too picky. I don't know.
Then again, who told Hal that such a tape existed? Did the person who
told him about its contents commit a felony? Did Hal commit a felony by
telling me what he did about the contents of that tape?
Bob
______________________________
http://www.blacksda.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=10128#
"It is my understanding that a one-sided conversation was illegally
taped by Danny towards the end of May. With a mind set on framing his
wife, her words have been misconstrued into saying what he wants people
to think. She mentions a trip to Las Vegas. He explains to all that she
is planning a rendezvous with "the doctor." In reality for weeks he has
offered Linda larger and larger sums of money for her to go to Las Vegas
and stay with her mother for six weeks to acquire residency, a
requirement for couples that want a quick divorce. For weeks she
refused. SHE NEVER WANTED A DIVORCE." (Arild)
"I have seen and heard the evidence upon which the board has taken the
action that it has taken." (Walt)
"We know that the long hours on the phone together were not about Nathan
and have hard evidence to support this knowledge - nor were times spent
together on both sides of the Atlantic." (Walt)
http://www.maritime-sda-online.org/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=UBB106&Number=85345
"Meanwhile, all during this time, Linda was spending long hours on the
phone with the doctor on international calls using phone cards, credit
cards, etc. We have records of those cards and can verify the amount of
time spent. Some calls were overheard by Danny when she did not know he
was around. Whereas she says that she was discussing her son, the calls
were, in fact not about her son, but were very personal." (Walt)
http://www.blacksda.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=10074&st=0#
"I must ask you again, is it right for a woman to spend hours at a time
secretely on the phone with another man - even if as claimed, they
concerned her son? - when we have good evidence that her son was a
peripheral matter, if at all." (Walt)
| 
