-------- Original Message --------
||Deb Young, Ron Christman
||3abn: Need document & a few questions
||Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:37:24 -0600
I was wondering if you could you send me a copy of the October 31, 2006,
document ("Procedural Suggestions") referred to in the statement you
issued on January 24, along with a list of all the names it went to.
Since we never got the October 31 document, we don't really know what it
Notice the following points:
- Linda was not contacted about an ASI review until November 12.
- You were not notified about Gailon being her choice of representative until November 14.
- No such document has yet been received.
Why does the statement on the 3ABN website still make the claim that
Linda and Gailon received that document on October 31? It's been a week
and a half since I called you about this discrepancy on January 24.
Have you been able to come up with an equitable way for "Linda's team"
to circulate their own statement to the same individuals who received
your statement? You will recall that I made this request since your
confidentiality agreement mandated that no statement be issued except
one that was mutually agreed upon, and since "Linda's team" was never
contacted about negotiating a mutually agreed upon statement.
Also, I am still curious, as I was in my email below, whether you can
assure me that Danny Shelton and/or the 3ABN board did not directly or
indirectly review, modify, or approve the original October 31 procedural
suggestions (and the document Linda received on November 12) and/or the
January 24 statement that you issued. Such assurance is critical in
establishing that ASI not only was capable of being impartial, but
actually was impartial.
I really think this whole matter about the ASI statement needs to be
resolved as quickly as possible, for the good of ASI's name and
reputation. Is it at all possible to respond quicker? My
last email was
sent to you nine days ago, and as far as I know, I haven't received a
of January 25, 2007, attached.]