-------- Original Message --------
||Walt Thompson, Elder Ken Denslow
||Question on discrepancy regarding automobile title.
||Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:44:17 -0600
I came across a discrepancy yesterday, and was wondering if
you could help me out with it. I'll write this as if I'm tacking
it on to the four emails I sent at Dr. Walt Thompson's suggestion
(he had written me and said, "I
would like to request ... that
you ... verify [this letter's] contents"), even though the topic
is a little different.
For the last four months I've tried to avoid digging through
the details regarding your divorce and remarriage. It just hasn't
interested me; I haven't been on a mission to exonerate Linda.
But it does seem appropriate to finally look into the topic a
What I'm trying to do is avoid any and all details that are
based merely on your or Linda's word, and stick with concrete
facts that can be irrefutably proven using legal and other documents.
Thus, your statements to Gailon in your email of October 8, 2006,
caught my attention.
You will recall that in that email you went into a bit of
detail about how good a "liar" Linda is, and then described the
watch incident. Since you and she dispute the cost of the watch,
the reason for the gift, and the precise circumstances of its
discovery, I want to ignore that and just touch on the following:
"She told me that she was going to go lay out by the swimming
pool. I decided to go look in her car for any evidence to support
the PI's claim that had not been mailed to me yet. Our car door
was locked. Yes, I'm aware that she claims it was her car but
I have proof that it is titled to both she and I even unto this
day. She didn't apparently remember that I too had keys to this
Toyota Sequoia. I opened the car door and opened the glove compartment.
What did I see? Yes, I saw the same watch described to me by
"I then pulled the picture of the watch from underneath my
shirt and showed it to her at which point she yelled out, "I
can't believe you broke into my car and got into my personal
belongings! This is abuse!' " (bold added)
I received a fax of Linda's automobile title from her bank
yesterday. You can view the title's top half, the half that contains
all the details, at
The VIN on the title did check
out as belonging to a Toyota Sequoia (4 dr. wagon/sport utility
with a 4.7 V8), so you are correct about that. I'll put below
the portions that concern the date of purchase, the date the
title was issued, and the owner(s) listed on the title:
Question 31: Can you explain how Linda's title has
had only her name on it since February 11, 2003, when you claimed
that your name was also on the title, or do you have any other
explanation for this discrepancy?
It would not surprise me if Linda has difficulty telling the
truth, and so if you do have irrefutable, concrete evidence similar
to the above that Linda has indeed lied, please send it to me
at your earliest convenience.
Regarding my previous four emails containing questions about
the Tommy Shelton child molestation allegations, I do hope you
can soon provide either some answers to explain the discrepancies
or at least issue an apology for how those allegations were handled.
I think it is absolutely vital that you give some sort of response
as soon as possible that either directly addresses those discrepancies
or makes an apology, for each day that goes by without this,
it just seems that your credibility is called more and more into
Trusting that your day will be filled with the peace that
passes understanding, peace that comes from the presence of the
Spirit in a heart renewed and cleansed by divine grace,