Sign Up!


Updated 1/10/2013
2011 Form 990

Updated 6/22/2011
3ABN sued
over Tommy!

Added 3/14/2010
Can 3ABN Survive?

Added 11/16/2010
Judge Rejects
Plea Deal

Updated 4/2/2010
Tommy Shelton

Must Read:
Mom in Pain #1

Mene, Mene,
Tekel, Parsin

The Actual Lawsuit
IRS Criminal Investigation

Divorce for Abandonment?

< Prev.Next >

-------- Original Message --------
From:  GW
To:  AUreporter
Subject:  divorce and remarriage
Date:  Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:53:03 GMT

Dear Mr. Joy ... :

I have read some of the evidence on your web site. As I understand it, Danny and Linda were happily married or it appeared that way by watching 3ABN prior to the campmeeting in 2004. According to Linda Shelton's web site she was faithful to her family including her son. She got her son in to see a doctor who treated her son. Danny abandoned his family which included Linda's son and did not support Linda consulting this doctor who treated her son. (The Bible says that a person who abandons his family is worse than an infidel.) Then Danny accused Linda of abandoning him because she was seeking medical care for her son. Then Danny divorced his wife and married another and also he committed adultery by marrying her who was put away (see Luke 16:18). Now by his teaching both in word and by example Danny teaches a different gospel than what Jesus taught (that one tittle of the law has failed) (see Luke 16:17). Now, you are wanting the conservative preachers who are now surrounding Danny and the General Conference leaders to stand up and condemn Danny for teaching another gospel. But, how can you get these conservative preachers and the General Conference leaders to stand up like John the Baptist (see Matthew 14:4) and condemn Danny, when, in 2000, in Toronto, the General Conference voted to put into the Church Manual that it is biblical for a person to divorce their spouse for abandonment and then marry another (even a divorced person) in contradiction to what Jesus taught in Luke 16:18?


< Prev.Next >
Not © 2008